Technovate AI
Manufacturing

Predicting equipment failure 72 hours out

False-positive rate dropped to 9%, downtime reduced 34%, and OEE improved by 6 percentage points.

Industry
Industrial manufacturing
Size
14 plants, 47 production lines
Engagement
16 weeks
Team
5 engineers, 1 reliability SME
False-positive rate
9%False-positive rate
Downtime reduction
34%Downtime reduction
OEE lift
+6 ptsOEE lift
The problem

Unplanned downtime cost the company an estimated $42M annually across 14 production lines.

Unplanned downtime cost Vertex an estimated $42M annually across 14 plants. The telemetry needed to predict most of those failures already sat in their historian, unused. A previous vendor pilot had produced alerts at roughly a 40% false-positive rate, and the floor had responded the way any team would — they muted it, and were sceptical of anything that followed.

The engagement

Industry
Industrial manufacturing
Size
14 plants, 47 production lines
Engagement
16 weeks
Team
5 engineers, 1 reliability SME
What we built

A multimodal model combining SCADA telemetry, vibration sensors, and floor-camera vision to forecast failures.

How we got there

Four phases, each with a written definition of done.

  1. Reconstruct the labels

    Usable failure labels did not exist. We derived them from work orders and operator logs, then had Vertex's reliability engineers validate every one before it entered a training set.

  2. Optimize for precision, explicitly

    Given the history, recall was worth less than credibility. We tuned against false positives first and accepted a shorter lead time on marginal asset classes to get there.

  3. Go multimodal

    SCADA telemetry alone plateaued well short of a useful lead time. Adding vibration spectra and floor-camera vision extended it to 72 hours across the main asset classes.

  4. Deploy at the edge

    The OT network is air-gapped from IT. Inference runs on edge hardware inside the plant boundary, with only aggregated predictions crossing into corporate systems.

Outcome

What changed.

The false-positive rate settled at 9% and has held there through a full year of operation, which is what earned the system a standing place in shutdown planning. Downtime on monitored lines fell 34% and OEE improved by six percentage points. Vertex has since extended coverage to three additional asset classes using the same pipeline.

False-positive rate
9%False-positive rate
Downtime reduction
34%Downtime reduction
OEE lift
+6 ptsOEE lift
The last vendor gave us a model. This team gave us something the floor supervisors actually check before they schedule a shutdown.
Marcus FeldVP Reliability Engineering, Vertex Manufacturing
Stack

What we built it with.

  • PyTorch
  • Python
  • Kafka
  • TimescaleDB
  • Docker
  • Azure
Manufacturing

More of our work in manufacturing.

Predictive maintenance, quality vision, and OEE-lifting systems that live on the line, not in the dashboard.

Similar problem?

Let's talk about what this would look like for you.

Thirty minutes with the senior team. Bring the problem and we will give you an honest read on scope, timeline, and whether we are the right fit.